Game by Joe
07:05, August 03, 2026 by Joe
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "20260731"]
[Round "?"]
[White "e4"]
[Black "d6 #36 +++++"]
[Result "0-1"]
[BlackElo "+2"]
[Source "Analyze This App"]
1. e4 d6 2. d4 e5 3. dxe5 dxe5 4. Qxd8+ Kxd8 5. Nf3 f6 6. Bc4 Nd7 7. O-O c6 8. Nc3
Kc7 9. Be3 Bc5 10. Rad1 {(-0.27 -> -0.92) Better try is 10. Bxc5 -0.27.} (10. Bxc5)
10... Bxe3 ({Stockfish 18 : depth=14} 10... Bxe3 11. fxe3 b5 12. Be6 Nh6 13. Ne1
Re8 14. Bb3 a5 15. a3 Nc5 16. Nd3 Nxb3 17. cxb3 Bg4 18. Rc1 Kb6 19. b4 {=/+ (-0.94)})
11. fxe3 b5 12. Bb3 Nc5 13. Rd2 $4 {(-0.89 -> -1.8) Think better is 13. Ne1 -0.89 [%csl Rd2,Rd1]}
(13. Ne1) 13... a5 ({Stockfish 18 : depth=18} 13... a5 14. a3 Rb8 15. Ra1 Ne7 16. Ne1
b4 17. axb4 axb4 18. Na4 Nxe4 19. Rdd1 Nf5 20. Nd3 Rd8 21. Rdc1 h5 22. Re1 Nfd6
23. Nac5 Nxc5 24. Nxc5 Rb5 25. Ne6+ Bxe6 26. Bxe6 {-/+ (-1.83)}) 14. a4 $6 {(-1.76 -> -3.06) 14. a3 -1.76 might have given some fight. [%csl Ra2,Ra4]}
(14. a3) 14... b4 ({Stockfish 18 : depth=17} 14... b4 15. Ne2 Nxe4 16. Rdd1 Ne7
17. Nd2 Ba6 18. Nxe4 Bxe2 19. Nc5 Kb6 20. Nd7+ Ka7 21. Nxf6 Bxd1 22. Rxd1 gxf6 23. Rd7+
Kb6 24. Rxe7 Rad8 25. Kf2 Rd2+ 26. Kf3 {-+ (-2.92)}) 15. Ne2 Nxe4 16. Rd3 $6 {(-2.87 -> -3.63) 16. Rdd1 -2.87 would have continued the struggle. [%csl Rd2,Rd3]}
(16. Rdd1) 16... Ne7 ({Stockfish 18 : depth=17} 16... Ne7 17. Rdd1 Nf5 18. Nd2 Nc5
19. Kf2 Nd6 20. Ng3 Ba6 21. Rfe1 h5 22. Kf3 g5 23. e4 g4+ 24. Ke3 {-+ (-3.64)})
17. Rfd1 Nc5 $3 {[%csl Gc5,Ge4]} 18. R3d2 Nxb3 {(-4.0 -> -3.01) Better is 18... Ne4 -4.0}
(18... Ne4) 19. cxb3 Be6 20. Ng3 Bxb3 21. Rc1 $6 {(-2.96 -> -4.41) 21. Rd7+ -2.96 would have continued the struggle. [%csl Rd1,Rc1]}
(21. Rd7+) 21... Bxa4 22. Ne4 Rhd8 23. Rxd8 $6 {(-4.39 -> -5.1) 23. Nc5 -4.39 might have given some fight. [%csl Rd2,Rd8]}
(23. Nc5) 23... Rxd8 24. Nc5 Rd1+ 25. Rxd1 Bxd1 26. Ne6+ Kb6 {(-5.82 -> -5.02) 26... Kd6 -5.82 is more accurate.}
(26... Kd6) 27. Nxg7 $6 {(-5.02 -> -6.75) 27. Nd2 -5.02 would have continued the struggle. [%csl Re6,Rg7]}
(27. Nd2) 27... Bxf3 28. gxf3 $6 {(-6.7 -> -7.35) 28. Kf2 -6.7 might have given some fight. [%csl Rg2,Rf3]}
(28. Kf2) 28... a4 29. Nf5 $6 {(-7.02 -> -9.11) 29. Nh5 -7.02 might have given some fight. [%csl Rg7,Rf5]}
(29. Nh5) 29... Nxf5 30. e4 $4 {(-8.28 -> -15.47) Blunder! Could have played the simple 30. Kg2 -8.28. [%csl Re4,Re3]}
(30. Kg2) 30... a3 31. bxa3 $4 {(-10.73 -> Mate in -11.) Walks into a mating net. What is wrong with 31. b3 -10.73? [%csl Ra3,Rb2]}
(31. b3) 31... bxa3 32. exf5 a2 33. Kg2 a1=Q 34. Kg3 Qg1+ 35. Kh3 h5 36. Kh4 Qxh2# {(Stockfish 18, depth=30)}
0-1
Include the game as a frame on your own website
Copy paste the following code to your webpage:
<!-- chesspastebin.com PGN viewer -->
<iframe
src="https://www.chesspastebin.com/minimal/24990"
width="600" height="400"
style="border: 0px solid #000000">
</iframe>
<!-- END OF chesspastebin.com PGN viewer -->